I was trying to install Fedora ..But I couldn;t ...It is showing some driver problem...like ""No Drives Found"" and I am using AMD Athlon 64 bit and Asus A8v.vm mother board with SIS chipset... May i Know Why its happening..
2009/2/24 <[email protected]> > Send fedora-list mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [email protected] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of fedora-list digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Skype and video[Was:Webcam recommendations?] (John Horne) > 2. Re: Domino on Fedora (Nifty Fedora Mitch) > 3. Re: current state of ati graphics (Bill Davidsen) > 4. Re: Web cam recommendations? (Erik P. Olsen) > 5. Re: Web cam recommendations? (John Horne) > 6. Network Manager Only Allows 1 connection only (JohnMinson) > 7. Easiest Way To Move Thunderbird Mail Folders To Another > Computer? (Robert L Cochran) > 8. Re: F-10 xmodmap/xkeycaps problem - (Kevin Kofler) > 9. Re: Gnome scanner utility crashes, no Bugzilla component > (Kevin Kofler) > 10. No .gnupg Directory On Fedora 10 (Robert L Cochran) > 11. Re: Easiest Way To Move Thunderbird Mail Folders To Another > Computer? (Kevin J. Cummings) > 12. Re: current state of ati graphics (Kevin Kofler) > 13. Re: Web cam recommendations? (Erik P. Olsen) > 14. Re: Linux users want better desktop performance (Screw data. > Prioritize code) (phil) > 15. Re: Upgraded to F10, (& Kjot disappeared) (Kevin Kofler) > 16. Re: F-10 xmodmap/xkeycaps problem - (Bob Goodwin) > 17. Re: kernel (Kevin Kofler) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 22:13:08 +0000 > From: John Horne <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Skype and video[Was:Webcam recommendations?] > To: "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using > Fedora." <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" > > On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 22:54 +0100, Fernando Apesteguía wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I'm using Skype 2.0.0.72 and I have a Logitech QuickCam for Notebooks, > > as reported by lsusb: > > > > idVendor 0x046d Logitech, Inc. > > idProduct 0x08dd QuickCam for Notebooks > > bcdDevice 1.00 > > > > With this version of Skype, I'm able to see other people doing video > > conference (better quality with compiz disabled), but I can't get the > > webcam working. In Options->Video, the webcam is detected, but when I > > push the "Test" button, all I get is this: > > > > Starting the process... > > Skype Xv: Xv ports available: 4 > > Skype XShm: XShm support enabled > > Skype Xv: Using Xv port 131 > > <Here Skype closes and I get the command prompt again> > > > > Nothing catches my eye in the system log. I tried to install > > libv4l.i386 but it didn't make any difference. > > > > Any success cases? Any hints on how to solve this? > > > For just testing the webcam video I used the 'ucview' command (it's in > the ucview package). As mentioned in the old thread, I have a Logitech > webcam, on a PC not a notebook though, and the ucview command detects > the webcam fine, and displays what the webcam sees (basically me looking > at my monitor!). > > I've been using skype from home to work using both audio and video. The > only problem I had was getting audio to work, one setting in skype > needed to be changed, then audio worked. > > Skype package is: skype-2.0.0.72-fc5.i586 > > > > John. > > -- > --------------------------------------------------------------- > John Horne, University of Plymouth, UK Tel: +44 (0)1752 587287 > E-mail: [email protected] Fax: +44 (0)1752 587001 > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:22:58 -0800 > From: Nifty Fedora Mitch <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Domino on Fedora > To: "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using > Fedora." <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > > On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 02:57:43PM +0000, James Wilkinson wrote: > > Nifty Fedora Mitch wrote: > > > Local delivery can be done with procmail. > > > > Yes, but if the command expects to use /usr/sbin/sendmail to send the > > mail, and that command isn’t there… > > > > > Nothing has to listen on 25. > > > > It might help if Domino did… > > > > > Go with the documented solution and if needed pull sendmail back into > the > > > system... In some ways this should be very much the same as switching > > > from sendmail to postfix i.e. > > > > > > Postfix is a Mail Transport Agent (MTA) > > > > > > A google or yahoo search of "domino MTA" > > > does find links that support my assertion > > > that Domino is a Mail Transoport Agent. > > > > You’re missing the point. Postfix provides .... > .... > > Hope this helps, > > Domino is moderatly expensive and it is well supported by > the vendor. Put them to work....! > > > http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/lotus/library/ls-Internet_messaging_with_the_SMTP_MTA/index.html > > If yum/ rpm demand that you install postfix or sendmail pick one > and just "chkconfig $it off". > > But seriously, Domino/Lotus has a rich support community > and while we can speculate on what it is and is not > the vendor has facts. Put the vendor to work.... > > > > -- > T o m M i t c h e l l > Found me a new hat, now what? > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:30:50 -0500 > From: Bill Davidsen <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: current state of ati graphics > To: [email protected] > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed > > Ian Malone wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm looking to upgrade my graphics card and for the past few > > iterations have gone with Nvida, mostly because they provided a > > working linux driver with 3D acceleration; most people I knew with ATI > > chipsets had problems with their drivers at one time or another (and > > for a long time only older cards were supported). Since AMD have > > apparently released the specs needed to write an open driver for them > > I thought it might be worth supporting them this time around, but I'm > > not sure what the current state of ATI support looks like. I'd guess > > there has been long enough for an accelerated driver to make it into > > the kernel, but I see that there is also a recent release of their > > proprietary driver. What are people's recent experiences with ATI? I > > wouldn't be looking for the highest end card, just something that can > > happily run compiz and flash videos 1280x1024. The nvidia I'm > > considering are around the 8500 / 9400 mark. > > > > Thanks for your time. > > > With any non-FOSS driver you accept that if you have a problem there are a > fair > percentage of developers who will not look at dump from a tainted kernel. > The > most recent FC10 drivers seem to work reliably (that was NOT true with the > initial install), but are not accelerated. I believe my last look showed > radeondrmfb, and I considered flgrx but decided reliable was enough, I > don't run > games or video benchmarks on my laptop, just boring work stuff, which is > fast > enough. It will run flash 1280x800 without a problem. > > > -- > Bill Davidsen <[email protected]> > "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from > the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 23:41:10 +0100 > From: "Erik P. Olsen" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Web cam recommendations? > To: "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using > Fedora." <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > On 23/02/09 23:08, John Horne wrote: > > On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 22:53 +0100, Erik P. Olsen wrote: > >> On 23/02/09 22:41, Fernando Apesteguía wrote: > >>> On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 10:33 PM, Erik P. Olsen <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>>> On 23/02/09 14:34, Fernando Apesteguía wrote: > >>>> [snip] > >>>>> You could try another choice like Ekiga, although I'm afraid to say > it > >>>>> doesn't reach the quality in video than Skype does (I can receive > >>>>> video with Skype) > >>>>> > >>>> What version of Skype do you have? The one I've got (version 2.0.0.72) > does not > >>>> seem to have any video support at all. > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> I'm gonna open a new thread instead of hijacking the subject of this > one :) > >>> > >> I don't think I hijacked the subject. It is about webcam recommendation > for > >> Skype and I don't believe that Skype for linux has video support, so > AFAICT no > >> webcam can be recommended at all. Or am I totally wrong? > >>>> [snip] > > Totally wrong I would say. I've got a Logitech Quickcam pro 9000 on my > > F10 box. It has both video and audio - works fine with skype. > > Thanks, but I can't find any newer version than 2.0.0.72 and I can't see > how you > enable video on this version. > > -- > Erik. > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 23:24:43 +0000 > From: John Horne <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Web cam recommendations? > To: Fedora Mailing List <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain > > On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 23:41 +0100, Erik P. Olsen wrote: > > > > Thanks, but I can't find any newer version than 2.0.0.72 and I can't see > how you > > enable video on this version. > > > The package I am running is skype-2.0.0.72-fc5.i586 (albeit on an F10 > x86_64 box). > > I don't think I had to enable it as such, skype automatically found the > webcam as a usb device. However, right-clicking on the skype icon and > selecting 'options' shows a 'Video Devices' section. Within there there > are tick-boxes to enable video, and select the video device. > > > > John. > > -- > --------------------------------------------------------------- > John Horne, University of Plymouth, UK Tel: +44 (0)1752 587287 > E-mail: [email protected] Fax: +44 (0)1752 587001 > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 6 > Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 18:46:29 -0500 > From: JohnMinson <[email protected]> > Subject: Network Manager Only Allows 1 connection only > To: "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using > Fedora." <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > all I want to do is add a second(static) ip (device alias 1) to my > interface in addition to the dhcp address all ready being procured . > I can find no combinations of 'Network Manager' settings that allows > this to happen . > If I plumb the interface manually after "Network Manager' is finished > initializing it works fine . > If I turn off NM I get this in the log > "localhost nm-system-settings: ifcfg-rh: Ignoring connection > 'System eth0 ' and its device because NM_CONTROLLED was false." > "localhost nm-system-settings: ifcfg-rh: Ignoring connection > 'System eth0:1' and its device because NM_CONTROLLED was false." > > this should not be this difficult > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 7 > Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 18:58:23 -0500 > From: Robert L Cochran <[email protected]> > Subject: Easiest Way To Move Thunderbird Mail Folders To Another > Computer? > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > I have a .thunderbird email client folder on a Fedora 7 x86_64 system > that I need to move to a Fedora 10 x86 system. It occurs to me that if I > move this, and then start thunderbird on the new system, I might have > trouble because of 64-bit code. Also trouble with updating Enigmail. I > want to be sure I can sign and encrypt email messages. Am I better off > just moving > > .thunderbird/[salt].default/Mail/* > .thunderbird/[salt].default/abook.mab > > What file(s) store the email account information? > > Or, to make a long story short, can I just tar up all of .thunderbird > and not worry about conflicts on the 32-bit system? > > Bob Cochran > Greenbelt, Maryland, USA > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 8 > Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 00:58:49 +0100 > From: Kevin Kofler <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: F-10 xmodmap/xkeycaps problem - > To: [email protected] > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > > Bob Goodwin wrote: > > One indication that it does not work is that when I run /usr/bin/xmodmap > > -e 'keycode 116=degree' in F-9 the key to the right of the right ALT key > > produces a degree ° symbol. > > > > The same command in F-10 makes it useless, that same key does nothing > > and the cursor down arrow key generates the degree symbol instead as > > well as no longer moving the cursor making it impossible to navigate > > though a file listing. > > You're hardcoding a keycode number, but evdev uses different keycodes. > > Kevin Kofler > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 9 > Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 01:02:45 +0100 > From: Kevin Kofler <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Gnome scanner utility crashes, no Bugzilla component > To: [email protected] > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > Michael Schwendt wrote: > > Confirmed. > > That looks like a bug in the dynamic updating of the form fields. > > Changing "Classification" updates "Product" listbox, but "Version" > > and "Target" listboxes don't change. > > It's not a bug, you have to click on "Refresh > Components/Versions/Milestones". They made it an explicit pushbutton > because having this done automatically was too slow, people did not > understand why their browser froze. > > Kevin Kofler > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 10 > Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 19:05:39 -0500 > From: Robert L Cochran <[email protected]> > Subject: No .gnupg Directory On Fedora 10 > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > I just noticed that I do not yet have a .gnupg directory on my Fedora 10 > system. I haven't tried to create a gpg keyring on it yet. I want to > migrate sensibly from a Fedora 7 system to a separate Fedora 10 system. > Can I go ahead and copy the .gnupg directory from the old system to the > new one? Or should I attempt to create a fresh .gnupg directory on the > Fedora 10 system and selectively copy elements of the .gnupg directory > from the old system? > > Thanks > > Bob Cochran > Greenbelt, Maryland, USA > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 11 > Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 19:07:38 -0500 > From: "Kevin J. Cummings" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Easiest Way To Move Thunderbird Mail Folders To Another > Computer? > To: "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using > Fedora." <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > Robert L Cochran wrote: > > I have a .thunderbird email client folder on a Fedora 7 x86_64 system > > that I need to move to a Fedora 10 x86 system. It occurs to me that if I > > move this, and then start thunderbird on the new system, I might have > > trouble because of 64-bit code. Also trouble with updating Enigmail. I > > There should be noting specific to 32-bit or 64-bit in your .thunderbird > directory. I know, I upgraded an FC6.i386 system to F9.x86_64 and my > Thunderbird just plain continued to work. > > > want to be sure I can sign and encrypt email messages. Am I better off > > just moving > > > > .thunderbird/[salt].default/Mail/* > > .thunderbird/[salt].default/abook.mab > > You could just move the entire .thunderbird/[salt].default directory > lock stock and barrel (AFAIK). Make sure you edit the > .thunderbird/profiles.ini file to properly reflect your default profile. > > > What file(s) store the email account information? > > They are all buried down in the profile directory structure. > > > Or, to make a long story short, can I just tar up all of .thunderbird > > and not worry about conflicts on the 32-bit system? > > That's my thought. Good luck! > > > Bob Cochran > > Greenbelt, Maryland, USA > > -- > Kevin J. Cummings > [email protected] > [email protected] > [email protected] > Registered Linux User #1232 (http://counter.li.org) > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 12 > Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 01:10:11 +0100 > From: Kevin Kofler <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: current state of ati graphics > To: [email protected] > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > Ian Malone wrote: > > Since AMD have apparently released the specs needed to write an open > > driver for them I thought it might be worth supporting them this time > > around, but I'm not sure what the current state of ATI support looks > like. > > For the Free Software drivers (i.e. NOT the proprietary fglrx): > http://dri.freedesktop.org/wiki/ATIRadeon > > In short, r1xx up to r5xx series are now supported with 2D (XRender) and 3D > (OpenGL) acceleration. In marketing names, that's up to X1950 (rule of > thumb: if it doesn't have "HD" in it, it should be supported - the HD* > models (r6xx/r7xx) and the X2300 HD which appears to be some sort of hybrid > between the r5xx architecture and some r6xx or r7xx one are not supported). > > Kevin Kofler > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 13 > Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 01:10:59 +0100 > From: "Erik P. Olsen" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Web cam recommendations? > To: "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using > Fedora." <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > On 24/02/09 00:24, John Horne wrote: > > On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 23:41 +0100, Erik P. Olsen wrote: > >> Thanks, but I can't find any newer version than 2.0.0.72 and I can't see > how you > >> enable video on this version. > >> > > The package I am running is skype-2.0.0.72-fc5.i586 (albeit on an F10 > > x86_64 box). > > > > I don't think I had to enable it as such, skype automatically found the > > webcam as a usb device. However, right-clicking on the skype icon and > > selecting 'options' shows a 'Video Devices' section. Within there there > > are tick-boxes to enable video, and select the video device. > > Gosh, you are right. I don't know how I missed seeing that. Found my old > webcam > and sure enough it worked right away. Thanks a lot for opening my eyes. > > -- > Erik. > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 14 > Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 00:14:17 +0000 > From: phil <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Linux users want better desktop performance (Screw data. > Prioritize code) > To: [email protected], "Community assistance, encouragement, > and advice for using Fedora." <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed > > Robin Laing wrote: > > Valent Turkovic wrote: > >> > http://rudd-o.com/en/linux-and-free-software/tales-from-responsivenessland-why-linux-feels-slow-and-how-to-fix-that > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> What is you comment? > >> > > > > I will have to try this at home. My home system is crawling and it > > could be related to some of these settings. I would like to see other > > fine tuning settings. > > > > I cannot afford a new machine at this time. > > > > acer use these settings as default on the aspire one in linpus (which is > based on fedora 8), though i think this was aimed more for the ssd > versions to increase the ssd lifetime more than speed up the user > experience > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 15 > Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 01:12:33 +0100 > From: Kevin Kofler <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Upgraded to F10, (& Kjot disappeared) > To: [email protected] > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > DB wrote: > > According to the blurb, using preupgrade would mean that my system > > remained usable during the upgrade > > You must have been mislead somehow. With preupgrade, the system remains > usable during the download phase, but not during the actual upgrade. > > > So I now seem to have a working F10 system, so far, I've not discovered > > anything major to moan about. However, I had just started using Kjot > > under F9, which seemed to be a useful gubbins..... and now in F10 it > > seems to have vanished. Anyone know where kjot might be hidden (or how > > I can get the old version back into service)?? > > As Rex Dieter already replied, it's now in kdepim. > > Kevin Kofler > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 16 > Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 19:15:25 -0500 > From: Bob Goodwin <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: F-10 xmodmap/xkeycaps problem - > To: "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using > Fedora." <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed > > Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Bob Goodwin wrote: > > > >> One indication that it does not work is that when I run /usr/bin/xmodmap > >> -e 'keycode 116=degree' in F-9 the key to the right of the right ALT key > >> produces a degree ° symbol. > >> > >> The same command in F-10 makes it useless, that same key does nothing > >> and the cursor down arrow key generates the degree symbol instead as > >> well as no longer moving the cursor making it impossible to navigate > >> though a file listing. > >> > > > > You're hardcoding a keycode number, but evdev uses different keycodes. > > > > Kevin Kofler > > > > > I can believe that! Where can I find the correct codes? > > If I can use those "Windows" keys and disable Caps Lock I will be > satisfied. > > Bob > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 17 > Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 01:17:08 +0100 > From: Kevin Kofler <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: kernel > To: [email protected] > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > > "StanisÅ‚aw T. Findeisen" wrote: > > Why doesn't Fedora use vanilla Linux kernel? > > Because packages need to be patched to integrate with the rest of the > distribution and the kernel is no exception. > > Because Fedora is about shipping new technologies which sometimes have to > be > backported to stable releases and the kernel is no exception. > > And to ask back: Why should it? > > One of Fedora's goals is to stay close to upstream (and in fact some other > distributions have a lot more kernel patches than Fedora does), but that > doesn't mean we ship completely vanilla upstream software without regards > to things like system integration. If we just did that (and if it even > worked, which is not always the case), what would be the purpose of the > distribution? > > Kevin Kofler > > > > ------------------------------ > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > > End of fedora-list Digest, Vol 60, Issue 187 > ******************************************** >
-- fedora-list mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
