2009/5/26 Ambrogio <[email protected]> > Il giorno lun, 25/05/2009 alle 16.00 +0200, Ambrogio ha scritto: > > Hi all, > > > > I can't understand why, but transcode on my fedora 9 terminate everytime > > with a segmentation fault. > > > Can I add that in the messages log I found > > May 25 16:37:07 delo kernel: transcode[22214]: segfault at 40 ip 001f43b4 > sp bf8dca60 error 4 in libselinux.so.1[1e2000+1a000] > May 25 16:37:12 delo kernel: transcode[22230]: segfault at 40 ip 001a43b4 > sp bfdd4710 error 4 in libselinux.so.1[192000+1a000] > May 25 16:37:17 delo kernel: transcode[22243]: segfault at 40 ip 001a43b4 > sp bfa693a0 error 4 in libselinux.so.1[192000+1a000] > May 25 16:37:20 delo kernel: transcode[22255]: segfault at 40 ip 002ea3b4 > sp bfecb800 error 4 in libselinux.so.1[2d8000+1a000] > May 25 16:37:27 delo kernel: transcode[22267]: segfault at 40 ip 001a43b4 > sp bfdbcf00 error 4 in libselinux.so.1[192000+1a000] > May 25 16:37:36 delo kernel: transcode[22279]: segfault at 40 ip 001a43b4 > sp bfca3de0 error 4 in libselinux.so.1[192000+1a000] > May 25 16:37:41 delo kernel: transcode[22291]: segfault at 40 ip 001f43b4 > sp bfe4bf80 error 4 in libselinux.so.1[1e2000+1a000] > May 25 16:37:45 delo kernel: transcode[22303]: segfault at 40 ip 002493b4 > sp bfcfbe40 error 4 in libselinux.so.1[237000+1a000] > > I disabled selinux
Did the problem go away once you disabled selinux? I am having the same issue but I did not want to disable it. Please let me know if your problem was resolved. Did anyone else here have the same problem? Thanks Vini
-- fedora-list mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
