Simon Wesp wrote:
This problem is like the duplicated zlib problematic for rsync and
zsync.
No, it isn't.
Is a modified zlib a duplicate of zlib? Or is it is own fork?
The latter.
Or whatever?
It's bad design. A package which hacks around into commonly accepted and
widely used system libraries is simply hacking around.
A proper design would "use zlib" without modifications, like many other
applications do, or to ask zlib's upstream to adopt the changes.
Ralf
--
fedora-list mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
