On Fri, 19 Jun 2009 08:44:52 -0400 Bill Davidsen <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm going to assume that question is for the O.P. and pass on it. > Fedora kernels are not kernel.org kernels, there are patches applied, > so there is at least some justification for starting with a Fedora > source. I wish there was a tool to scan the hardware installed (or > modules loaded) and generate a minimal kernel config supporting just > what's needed on a given system. Like "make localconfig" > Second this. That would be great. I dropped the size by 90% for a time by eliminating unneeded functionality, then some change came along that made my config file unstable, and I couldn't get back. This seems to be a problem generally, that there is a lot of dependency between options that isn't clear. A tool to create a "custom" kernel would be excellent. I suspect it would be a lot of work to create and maintain though, especially at the rate the kernel changes. -- fedora-list mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
