Jack Howarth wrote:
>   Has anyone else noticed that swig-1.3.39-1.fc10 has dependency
> problems? I am seeing...

Yes, it was noted in the comments of the package update¹, had a bug
filed², and an updated package built which is awaiting the next push³.

Why the initial update was pushed directly to the stable updates, I
don't know.  This is the sort of thing that would be caught in
updates-testing (at least until the push process can perform such
sanity checks automatically).

¹ https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-8145
² https://bugzilla.redhat.com/514983
³ https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/swig-1.3.39-3.fc10

-- 
Todd        OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Despite the high cost of living, it remains a popular item.

Attachment: pgps3UxiYbJpU.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Reply via email to