Tom Horsley wrote:
>>> ... And they use deb-packages - there's no yum.
>
> They guys who have to actually package up our software at work
> consider that an advantage. From the practical complications
> involved in packaging, they say deb packages are infinitely easier
> to understand and generate than rpms.

That's simply opinion, just as I feel that packaging rpms is
infinitely easier than packaging debs.  I've done a bit of both and I
would take a single spec file anyday over the much higher number of
files involved in created anything more than a dirt-simple deb
package. :)

-- 
Todd        OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
It could be that the purpose of your life is only to serve as a
warning to others.
    -- Demotivators (www.despair.com)

Attachment: pgpK7PiWq3pIO.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Reply via email to