Jesse Keating wrote:
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 13:07:10 -0500
Jeremy Katz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Don't do that. You're basically saying that you have a repository
named foo but foo is two different things depending on how you run.
[snip]
Are there any genuine bugs in anything I described above?
Shouldn't yum warn or error out when it sees the repodata arch
conflict?
repodata doesn't have an inherent archness. You can have repodata
containing packages of all arches.
FWIW in pungi I use a single cache name for all arches. However for
every single run I expire the metadata and require fresh metadata be
downloaded. This seems to work for me, not many people have complained
about getting new repodata every run.
What do you use to expire the metadata? That sounds very useful. I
would like to keep a single cachedir mainly for the RPMS and not
necessarily the metadata.
Warren Togami
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Fedora-livecd-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-livecd-list
