On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 14:57 -0500, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 13:07:10 -0500 > Jeremy Katz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Don't do that. You're basically saying that you have a repository > > named foo but foo is two different things depending on how you run. > > > > [snip] > > > Are there any genuine bugs in anything I described above? > > > Shouldn't yum warn or error out when it sees the repodata arch > > > conflict? > > > > repodata doesn't have an inherent archness. You can have repodata > > containing packages of all arches. > > FWIW in pungi I use a single cache name for all arches. However for > every single run I expire the metadata and require fresh metadata be > downloaded. This seems to work for me, not many people have complained > about getting new repodata every run.
That doesn't sound crazy. If someone were to provide the patch, I'd almost certainly apply it. Or I'll get to it "eventually" Jeremy -- Fedora-livecd-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-livecd-list
