It's now clear I will make the time to help do this, as the LiveCD build system seems to be the best way to accomplish many goals I have. Some of this may require a fork of select packages from RHEL mainstream, I understand this. It's an external requirement in my case.
livecd-tools is currently release 013-5.el5 in EPEL for RHEL 5 I know several have mentioned other components are involved. E.g., as Rahul pointed to me earlier, the CentOS guys have updated several components in their project (pykickstart, etc...): http://www.nanotechnologies.qc.ca/propos/linux/centos-live/i386/live/RPMS/ Ultimately I would like to make the system more flexible for various boots, if possible with that same framework. But that's more eccentric to my needs. I'd just like to address the few differences between Fedora and RHEL, even if that means a few packages are forked and unsupported (at least outside of GPS ;). -- Bryan J Smith - Senior Consultant - Red Hat GPS SE US mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +1 (407) 489-7013 (Mobile) mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (non-RH/ext to Blackberry) ----------------------------------------------------- For every dollar you spend on Red Hat solutions, you not only fund the leading community development re- source, but you receive the #1 IT industry leader in corporate value. http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/ -- Fedora-livecd-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-livecd-list
