On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 14:41 -0400, Bryan J Smith wrote: > It's now clear I will make the time to help do this, as the LiveCD build > system seems to be the best way to accomplish many goals I have. Some > of this may require a fork of select packages from RHEL mainstream, I > understand this. It's an external requirement in my case. > > livecd-tools is currently release 013-5.el5 in EPEL for RHEL 5 > > I know several have mentioned other components are involved. E.g., as > Rahul pointed to me earlier, the CentOS guys have updated several > components in their project (pykickstart, etc...): > http://www.nanotechnologies.qc.ca/propos/linux/centos-live/i386/live/RPMS/ > > Ultimately I would like to make the system more flexible for various > boots, if possible with that same framework. But that's more eccentric > to my needs. I'd just like to address the few differences between > Fedora and RHEL, even if that means a few packages are forked and > unsupported (at least outside of GPS ;).
[ I accidentally hit send before this was complete. ] So, other than the changelogs and some diffs (and the CentOS 5 LiveCD changes), what are the big showstoppers to things not working for RHEL? Is there already some notes somewhere on this? Thanx! -- Bryan J Smith - Senior Consultant - Red Hat GPS SE US mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +1 (407) 489-7013 (Mobile) mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (non-RH/ext to Blackberry) ----------------------------------------------------- For every dollar you spend on Red Hat solutions, you not only fund the leading community development re- source, but you receive the #1 IT industry leader in corporate value. http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/ -- Fedora-livecd-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-livecd-list
