On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 12:10:30 -0500, Bryan J Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > > If anything, it seems there is no reason not to continue utilizing ISO > 9660. I see no reason that you wouldn't have ISOLinux and all of its > files inside of the first 4GiB, before the Linux kernel loads with ISO > 9660 Level 3 support. Heck, does ISOLinux support Level 3 as well?
Is that better supported than udf? Is it easy to use with mkisofs? Is there a way to guaranty proper placement of /boot where the bios can see it? -- Fedora-livecd-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-livecd-list
