On Tue, 2008-12-16 at 17:49 -0500, Jeremy Katz wrote: > I'm not against allowing udf, but we should probably use iso9660 unless > the size forces us to need udf just to avoid problems on as many systems > as we can.
I just wanted to note that I was analyzing from a standpoint of ignorance and assumption, and not hands-on testing with the patch. I don't anyone basing decisions on my commentary other than as a "review," but not actual testing. -- Bryan J Smith - Senior Consultant - Red Hat GPS SE US mailto:[email protected] +1 (407) 489-7013 (Mobile) mailto:[email protected] (non-RH/ext to Blackberry) ----------------------------------------------------- For every dollar you spend on Red Hat solutions, you not only fund the leading community development re- source, but you receive the #1 IT industry leader in corporate value. http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/ -- Fedora-livecd-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-livecd-list
