On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 7:37 AM, Sebastian Vahl<deadbaby...@googlemail.com> wrote: <snip> > x86_64 images (around 40 megs). The slighlty different package list couldn't > explain this (i.e. atlas-sse (i686) vs. atlas (x86_64) is the only important > difference). > So I've compared the sizes of the installed packages (rpm -qa --qf "%{name} > {size}\n" | sort -nr). Many packages are different in size but the kernel does > have the biggest difference: > i686: 78453688 > x86_64: 103736431 <snip>
I haven't tested extensively just yet, but in a conversation with Kevin Fenzi the other day he noted that the 64-bit version of the Xfce spin was inflated by ~35MB or so because of dracut which is something we might need to adress with the dracut guys/gals/team/whatever. I don't know if the 32-bit version of the Xfce spin is also effected or not just yet, the compose I did on Monday I don't believe included dracut so I can't really say this is it for sure ... just something I thought I'd mention. -Adam -- http://maxamillion.googlepages.com --------------------------------------------------------- () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments -- Fedora-livecd-list mailing list Fedora-livecd-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-livecd-list