Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 11:29:49PM +0100, Farkas Levente wrote: >> Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >>> On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 09:45:08PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >>>> On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 10:33:40PM +0100, Farkas Levente wrote: >>>>> there is a newer 3.13 w32api released, it'd be useful to update. >>>> I'll see if I can do an update now. >>> Build here: >>> >>> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1000750 >>> >>> BTW, I'm only updating Rawhide, except in case of: (1) security, (2) >>> native Fedora package in an older branch is updated, or (3) someone >> imho it's a special case since w32api has no native fedora packages. >> >>> files a BZ requesting a branch be updated. Probably in the case of >>> (3) they'll have to do the work too, and in no case do we want to get >>> unnecessarily out of step with the corresponding native branch. >> does this means none of the filesystem, > > mingw32-filesystem is a bit of a special case: So far we've tried to > keep the 3 versions identical. Probably we should allow them to > diverge, but at the moment I'm not aware of any changes that need to > be made to this package, so it's moot. > >> w32api, runtime will be updated >> in any branch even if mingw update these packages? > > Rawhide is for rapid updates. I'm not stopping you or anyone else > from backporting these updates to EL-5 and F-10, but IMHO it > multiplies the work more than three-fold, with no particular gain.
as now there is not any 'real' mingw packages added to fedora what can be the reason not updating these two packages. imho these packages has a new version every half year so they are not so rapid. -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!" _______________________________________________ fedora-mingw mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fedora-mingw
