Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 11:58:40PM +0100, Farkas Levente wrote:
>> as now there is not any 'real' mingw packages added to fedora what can
>> be the reason not updating these two packages. imho these packages has a
>> new version every half year so they are not so rapid.
>
> If you want to backport them, please do so.
>
> Rich.
>
what do you call backport in this case? all the changes is the rewrite
of the version and the upload of the new sources?!
anyway imho it's be better to keep the three branch at the same level...
but of course i can do it for el-5...
--- devel/mingw32-w32api.spec 2008-12-15 22:51:55.000000000 +0100
+++ EL-5/mingw32-w32api.spec 2008-11-26 18:19:29.000000000 +0100
@@ -5,8 +5,8 @@
%define __find_provides %{_mingw32_findprovides}
Name: mingw32-w32api
-Version: 3.13
-Release: 1%{?dist}
+Version: 3.12
+Release: 8%{?dist}
Summary: Win32 header files and stubs
License: Public Domain
@@ -58,10 +58,7 @@
%changelog
-* Mon Dec 15 2008 Richard W.M. Jones <[email protected]> - 3.13-1
-- New upstream version 3.13.
-
-* Tue Dec 9 2008 Richard W.M. Jones <[email protected]> - 3.12-8
+* Wed Nov 26 2008 Richard W.M. Jones <[email protected]> - 3.12-8
- Force rebuild to get rid of the binary bootstrap package and replace
with package built from source.
--
Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!"
_______________________________________________
fedora-mingw mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fedora-mingw
