On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 6:49 PM, Richard W.M. Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 06:34:07PM +0200, Ryan McDougall wrote:
>> dbus, > problematic -- see below > > DBus is a real delight to package. There's a fork of the base dbus > package for Windows, called windbus, which I made a rather speculative > package from. It compiles but I'm not sure to what extent is works > (also I notice that telepathy needs a more recent dbus): > > http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-misc.cgi/fedora-mingw--devel/file/tip/dbus > > However this really needs someone to take it in hand and sort it out. > The situation is mostly summarised here: > > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dbus/2008-November/010586.html > > Rich. Have you got the non-forked dbus to compile for mingw? Have you divined the difference between windbus and upstream? I just fired an email off to Tor, because we both appear to be based in finland. Have you had a chance to speak with the winkde people? I just spotted this today, so I don't know what they are using. I presume its some custom cmake files, since they appear to have msvc builds. They also have dbus. http://www.winkde.org/pub/kde/ports/win32/releases/unstable/latest/ ps. our project is at http://www.realxtend.org Cheers, _______________________________________________ fedora-mingw mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fedora-mingw
