On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 8:32 PM, Richard W.M. Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 07:13:00PM +0200, Ryan McDougall wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 6:49 PM, Richard W.M. Jones <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dbus/2008-November/010586.html >> Have you got the non-forked dbus to compile for mingw? Have you >> divined the difference between windbus and upstream? I just fired an >> email off to Tor, because we both appear to be based in finland. > > It's possible, but really it needs someone to first get the windbus > changes upstream into dbus, in small chunks that the dbus developers > can digest. Basically that's what no one has got around to going yet. > >> Have you had a chance to speak with the winkde people? I just spotted >> this today, so I don't know what they are using. I presume its some >> custom cmake files, since they appear to have msvc builds. They also >> have dbus. >> >> http://www.winkde.org/pub/kde/ports/win32/releases/unstable/latest/ > > No .. Do you know how / on what platform they build these? >
I am guessing its cmake on windows, because its a project to put kde on windows, kde uses cmake, and they have mscv binaries. I also heard that windbus is from the same kde people, and is kinda a stop-gap way to get dbus on windows -- which would explain why its not as complete as upstream would like, and it doesn't appear as if there is a hurry to make it more complete... Will investigate the kde side some more... Cheers, _______________________________________________ fedora-mingw mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fedora-mingw
