On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 08:31:17AM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 11:40:54PM +0100, Farkas Levente wrote: > > i can risk it! > > let's ask fesco! > > There is no possible way we can do this before the Fedora 11 features > deadline. Going back through FESCO would take a minimum of two weeks, > assuming it went smoothly, which is highly unlikely. Then we'd have > to do full reviews of 31 packages again.
Given where we are in release process, I think maintaining focus on mingw32 only for F11 is the right thing. Then have a new feature for F12 'Fedora generalized cross compilers' to re-architect things to cope with OS-X / Win64 (and whatever else people care about) Daniel -- |: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :| _______________________________________________ fedora-mingw mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fedora-mingw
