Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 02:58:44PM +0100, Farkas Levente wrote: >> Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >>> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 01:58:38PM +0100, Farkas Levente wrote: >>>> at the same time i'd name cross-headers on all platform (ie. rename >>>> mingw32-w32api to headers to use the same naming convention). >>> Yeah ... but ... >>> >>> The name of mingw32-w32api has almost no impact on end users, since we >>> wouldn't expect them to install this package explicitly. >>> >>> So we'd rename it, at a cost of a full review, hours of work at >>> minimum. But to what purpose? >> cross-headers can be build form the same src.rpm (which contains 3 >> source tarball) as any other cross pacakges. > > At this time this is not true. The three upstream projects > (mingw.org, mingw-w64 and Apple) ship different sets of headers. > > Because the mingw-w64 headers are supposedly a strict superset of the > mingw.org headers, we might be able to combine them at some point in > the future. However that certainly isn't possible now because there > are divergences between the headers.
i'd not like to merge headers (although it'd be nice too), but build in one src.rpm the 3 platform same as with zlib. -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!" _______________________________________________ fedora-mingw mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fedora-mingw
