Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: esdl - SDL bindings for Erlang https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188207 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-25 11:06 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > > I have no idea what it's on about here, or why RPM would choose to put > > copies of > > development files into the debuginfo RPM. I'm not inclined to hold up > > inclusion > > of this package because of this, > > These can be fixed by removing the exec bit from the listed files using chmod > in > %prep. There's no reason for .c or .h files to be executable... Indeed. Strangely the installed .c and .h files are non-executable, whereas the files in build dir are. I included a fix in the spec file. http://math.ifi.unizh.ch/fedora/5/i386/SRPMS.gemi/erlang-esdl-0.95.0630-3.fc5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
