Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: libGLw https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188974 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-25 11:32 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > 2 remarks: > - The summary isn't quite correct: LibGLw provides Xt and Xm OpenGL widgets. > It doesn't provide Xaw widgets. > > - Instead of building a standalone libGLw from Mesa's tarball, wouldn't it be > easier to use SGI's original sources (I don't know if and where they still are > available as a separate tarball) and to patch them to Mesa's state, or even to > drop Mesa's libGLw in favor of SGI's? Possibly. I'm not 100% certain, but I think SGI's is what was present in XFree86 and X.Org monolithic source tree. Might want to have the license police go over it with a fine tooth comb first though, as ISTR there being some bad-juju SGI licenses in the tree, although I don't remember if that was for libGLw, or for GLX. Ajax probably remembers though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedoraemail@example.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review