Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: dssi - Disposable Soft Synth Interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189892 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-21 16:22 EST ------- Ah, licensing. According to the README, the header is LGPL, and jack-dssi-host is "BSD-style". COPYING is included for the header, but everything else seems to have the license in the source code. jack-dssi-host contains: /* * Copyright 2004 Chris Cannam, Steve Harris and Sean Bolton. * * Permission to use, copy, modify, distribute, and sell this software * for any purpose is hereby granted without fee, provided that the * above copyright notice and this permission notice are included in * all copies or substantial portions of the software. */ Does this count as BSD? Everything in the examples directory has something to the effect of "This example file is in the public domain." Note that dssi_osc_send and dssi_osc_update are in the main package, which otherwise seems like the right place to me. So, my guess is dssi-devel should be "License: LGPL", dssi-examples should be "License: Public Domain", and the main package "License: BSD/Public Domain" however mock complains about that one. Maybe it can just be "Distributable". Someone who is knowledgeable in licensing, please take a look at this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
