Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: rss-glx -- Really Slick Screensavers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188574 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-23 10:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > You might consider being a bit more descriptive in %description. Perhaps > something like: > > A port of the Really Slick Screensavers to GLX. Provides several visually > impressive and graphically intensive screensavers. > > Note that this package contains only the display hacks themselves; you will > need > to install the appropriate subpackage for your desktop environment in order to > use them as screensavers. > > (Or whatever; I'm making this up on the spot. The point is that people won't > understand what is meant by "contains only the hacks themselves".) Thanks, I've updated the description blocks accordingly. > The permissions on rss-glx-rm-matrixview.sh are 0775, which is a bit odd (and > rpmlint complains about it). Executable documentation is generally frowned > upon > and rpmlint also complains about it (because your documentation pulls in an > additional /bin/bash dependency). I would recommend just installing it 0644 > and > leave it at that. Done. > Is there any reason to package rss-glx_install.pl? This pulls in an odd > perl(strict) dependency but not a plain perl dependency, which looks a bit > odd. > (I know perl provides perl(strict), but perl probably shouldn't be needed at all.) Not necessary and removed. > You use $RPM_BUILD_ROOT in some places and %buildroot in others. The > packaging > guidelines require one or the other to be used consistently. Fixed. The new files are at the usual locations with the new SRPM at: http://tiptoe.de/dav/rss-glx-0.8.1-0.4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedoraemail@example.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review