Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: openais standards based cluster framework

------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-05-26 22:31 EST -------
(In reply to comment #20)
> (In reply to comment #19)
> > (In reply to comment #18)
> > > - Still shipping static libs
> > > - Packages still contain unowned dirs
> > > - Compilation still doesn't honor optflags
> > > 
> > > Without having looked into details, packaging of dynamic libs/plugins 
> > > seems to
> > > be way off from any common conventions on Linux.
> > > 
> > 
> > Thank you for your comments.


Thank you for your comments and suggestions.

I have modified the specfile and project as follows:
* Indeed this time I believe I have the unowned dirs problem solved.
* The static libraries have been removed from the RPM.
* The devel libraries have been renamed with links from and
* The lcrso files have been moved to /usr/libexec/lcrso as this was suggested as
a better location for the files.
* optflags is now honored
* all warnings related to optflags have been resolved and merged upstream

The lcrso files (part of the main package) do not need a version number.  They
are not meant to be processed by ldconfig or other system utilities.  The LCRSO
system handles all versioning since it must handle live replacement while a
process is active.

Please find the new files at the following location:
Spec URL:

Configure bugmail:
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

Fedora-package-review mailing list

Reply via email to