Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: qsa: Qt Script for Applications


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191589





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-06-11 11:37 EST -------
Thaks, I'll try to roll up a 1.1.4 package in the next few days. As for the
naming convention, it seems stat if qt 4.1.x will make its way into fc5, it will
be called qt4, while qt 3.3.x will be called just qt. So why not to rename your
package to qsa4 (or qsa-qt4), while mine will be called just qsa (or qsa-qt3)?
Wouldn't it be more consistent? I don't mean to be intrusive.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

Reply via email to