Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: qsa: Qt Script for Applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191589 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-11 13:56 EST ------- I forgot about the need for 2 qsa's. The packaging guidelines are relatively clear on this, that addons to a package foo should be named (something like) foo-addon. In our case(s), I'd suggest naming *this* one qt4-qsa, and the other (qt3) one qt-qsa so it is immediately clear looking at the name which qt is assiciated with which qsa pkg. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedorafirstname.lastname@example.org http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review