Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: qsa: Qt Script for Applications


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191589





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-06-11 13:56 EST -------
I forgot about the need for 2 qsa's.  The packaging guidelines are relatively
clear on this, that addons to a package foo should be named (something like)
foo-addon.

In our case(s), I'd suggest naming *this* one qt4-qsa, and the other (qt3) one
qt-qsa so it is immediately clear looking at the name which qt is assiciated
with which qsa pkg.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

Reply via email to