Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: gwyddion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187294 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-06 10:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > In that case the licence tag should be > License: GPL If everyone likes to repeat the common `GNU license' mistake just with the second part of the name this time (there are dozens of SomeProgram General Public Licenses that are not GNU GPL), if everyone thinks that `GPL' actually denotes something, or that it should be put to the License field even it does not mean anything, or that something should be put into the License field even if the license of a large part of the software if very different, and above all that the proper license acronym `GNU GPL' cannot be there, well, I can put GPL or cauliflower or whatever there, no problem, the tag is obviously not supposed to mean anything. But it isn't a technical issue so I won't make new src.rpm now just to mangle one tag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
