Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: jokosher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199029 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-17 03:45 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > According to Yum, gnonlin is not in Core, Updates, or Extras, so this package > - > with regards to Extras - would not be self-supporting in that it would need a > dependency external to the default repositories. Perhaps you'd also want to > submit Gnonlin for inclusion into Extras as well? Gnonlin is indeed in extras. > > Also, you should not use the Packager: tag in your spec. See: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-c17fb8c1ce9be40da720a2b25d1e2a241062038f > > Thirdly, your package would probably break on 64-bit systems, as you hardcode > /lib/ into the path of %_pythondir. Please use a macro for this instead, such > as > %{_lib} (or %{_libdir}, etc. as needed). > > Forth, you really should be using %{python_sitedir} and following the %files > section correctly as mentioned in Packaging/Python on the Wiki. See: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python > > Lastly, in the %changelog, you simply have a [EMAIL PROTECTED] identifier. > I'm not > certain, but I believe that this is supposed to be a full and valid email > address (such as "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" or something similar). Thank you for these. I shall update and resubmit. Regards Chris -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
