Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-08 05:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #31) > (In reply to comment #30) > > I will prefer not to move docs from /usr/share/gutenprint/doc to > > /usr/share/doc/gutenprint. > > Hmmm, we don't seem to have anything in the guidelines for this AFAICS. But > IMHO > all docs should be marked as %doc and thus should land in > /usr/share/doc/<packagename-version-release> (the proper place used by all > other > packages) > > Maybe we need to add such a rule :-/ Sure if you think like that. Primary looking at package said me that let that doc files be in /usr/share/gutenprint/doc Then i check under /usr/share on my system using find . -name doc * and i got following output ./sane/xsane/doc ./cups/doc ./apps/quanta/doc ./sgml/docbook/xsl-stylesheets-1.69.1-5/htmlhelp/doc ./scrollkeeper/doc ./vim/vim70/doc ./eclipse/plugins/org.python.pydev_0.9.3/PySrc/ThirdParty/logilab/common/doc ./eclipse/plugins/org.python.pydev_0.9.3/PySrc/ThirdParty/logilab/pylint/doc ./pear/doc ./gutenprint/doc where some of the entries belongs to Fedora Core packages. So it looks to me that either we have different strategy for Fedora Extras or we have some Guidelines that will require a major changes when a package moves from Fedora Extras to Fedora Core. Then i would like to see that Guidelines page. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
