Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: clement-2.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176253 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-14 08:04 EST ------- Seems I do not explain myself right... %{_usr}/bin/%{name} MUST be own by 'somebody' else than root to have clement to know, once started, under which ID it must run (the application look about the file ownership and say 'ok lets seteuid to this'), if the application is not setuid the only other way is to hard code the effective uid, this is not good from my stand point. I choosed 'mail' because this ID is used by related application. I want to give possibility to change this on the fly by local sysadmin. useradd and groupadd clement where part of the original implementation but removed to comply to rpmlint. If rpmlint is a reference tools to 'the right way to do something' warning can't ignore. IMHO rpmlint warning are 'you are doing something which can work but are against established standard'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
