Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: CGAL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199168 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-16 11:55 EST ------- > - Static libs: My view on static libs is somewhere between Patrice and Ralf. In situations where upstream does not provide a build mechanism for shared libs then I think it is acceptable for Fedora Extras packagers to ship static libs in -devel (that is, I don't think its necessary to force FE packagers to modify the build files to the extent needed to produce shared instead of static). And, this view is entirely consistent with the Packaging Guidelines as they are currently written. That said, we can always submit patches to the upstream folks and try to help them build and use shared libs. Helping the upstream projects is an honorable thing! :-) In any case, using the latest (-14) SRPM: + significantly cleaned up spec file (good!) + built for me in mock on FC5-i386 + has an ability to work with LEDA but, since LEDA is now proprietary, its fine that we don't try to use it (OK) - has an ability to work with TAUCS and, since TAUCS is LGPL, we should seriously consider packaging it for FE and using it as a CGAL build dependency Anyway, I'll submit a more thorough review later this week... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedoraemail@example.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review