Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478668 --- Comment #18 from Christoph Wickert <[email protected]> 2009-04-11 11:39:38 EDT --- Thanks a lot for this review. (In reply to comment #17) > MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual > license. > ---------------------------------- > ==> NOT OK > The actual license seems to be "GPLv2" and not "GPLv2+" COPYING included in this package is GPLv2 and there is no way to distinguish, it this means "GPLv2 only" or "GPLv2+". In cases like these you need to look at the sourcecode and src/utils.c states: * Copyright 2008 PCMan <[email protected]> * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. So the actual license really is GPLv2+. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
