Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478668 --- Comment #19 from Martin-Gomez Pablo <[email protected]> 2009-04-11 12:32:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > (In reply to comment #17) > > MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual > > license. > > ---------------------------------- > > ==> NOT OK > > The actual license seems to be "GPLv2" and not "GPLv2+" > > COPYING included in this package is GPLv2 and there is no way to distinguish, > it this means "GPLv2 only" or "GPLv2+". In cases like these you need to look > at > the sourcecode and src/utils.c states: > > * Copyright 2008 PCMan <[email protected]> > * > * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify > * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by > * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or > * (at your option) any later version. > > So the actual license really is GPLv2+. Thanks for the advice, I didn't think about checking the source code. So you can begin the CVS procedure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
