Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #25 from Jussi Lehtola <[email protected]> 2009-05-29 04:03:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #24) > rpmlint complains on the absence of documentation for the non -devel package. > I > would alter the %file section as per following: > %files > %defattr(-,root,root,-) > %{_libdir}/*.so.* > %doc README.txt LICENSE.txt > > It effectively duplicates the README.txt and LICENSE.txt files, but I think it > is normal to repeat both of those on the two generated packages. The guideline > (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Duplicate_Files) may not > be clear enough on that part. I'd place at least the LICENSE.txt in the main package, since it applies to the main package too. The development documentation, however, should go with -devel (unless it is so big that it should be branched into a separate -doc package). As the -devel package requires the main package, the documentation of the main package is also available whenever -devel is installed, and thus there is no need to duplicate the file(s). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
