Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505155 --- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola <[email protected]> 2009-06-11 09:25:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Jussi, note that the version is bumped so release doesn't have to be. OK, I hadn't noticed that. > And the library itself should stay in /lib{64,} because the system core > utilities will depend on it. The question is only about the devel symlink. Okay, in that case, my bad. However, Tomas is right; there are quite a few .so files in %{_lib}. > Also the timestamps guideline is not a strict guideline - note the 'consider' > word in the guideline and so on. Yes, but it's trivial and doesn't hurt anything to keep them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
