Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686





--- Comment #60 from Jussi Lehtola <[email protected]>  2009-06-14 08:48:29 
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #56)
> The package from my point of view is fine. Any objection before I approve it ?
> http://arma.sf.net/fedora/armadillo-0.6.11-7.fc10.src.rpm  

IMO the Requires: atlas-devel, lapack-devel of armadillo-devel are probably
unnecessary. If one builds with
 g++ -larmadillo
not with
 g++ -llapack -latlas -larmadillo
then one doesn't need atlas-devel or lapack-devel and these can be safely
dropped, since armadillo acts as a wrapper for the atlas and lapack libraries.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

Reply via email to