Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507110 --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka <[email protected]> 2009-06-27 14:11:32 EDT --- Some notes: * License tag - For this package license tag should be "LGPLv2+". * pkgconfig .pc file - openal.pc (note: see below) contains: --------------------------------------------------- 3 libdir=${exec_prefix}//usr/lib --------------------------------------------------- (on i586), which is apparently wrong. * Conflict - Fedora strongly recommends _not_ to use Conflicts: on such file namespace conflict like this and requests to resolve this type of conflicts: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Conflicts#Conflicting_Files I think - %_libdir/libopenal.so should be renamed to libopenal-soft.so - %_bindir/openal-info should be renamed to openal-soft-info - %_includedir/AL should be renamed to %_includedir/openal-soft or so (anyway the directory name "AL" is too short) - %_libdir/pkgconfig/openal.so should be renamed to openal-soft.pc and its contents should be modified to respect includedir name change - %_bindir/openal-config (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #3) > > (Removing NEEDSPONSOR) > > Mamoru, I'm willing to sponsor Thomas after this review because he is a friend > of mine. - Well, I don't know how to change sponsor of one person on FAS... Anyway you can help Thomas in any way and I am happy with it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
