Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507110 --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka <[email protected]> 2009-06-28 12:11:21 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > I think openal need to be replaced with openal-soft as it is in debian/ubuntu? > The devs and communtiy is talking about this sicene F10 was under dev. > What you think about that? - In such case (i.e. if you think openal should complete by replaced by openal-soft), would you contact openal maintainer? (Filing a bug against openal component is better with mentioning this review request on the filed bug). > When i will rename all wo openal-soft the tools that need oal-soft header and > libs will don´t find them. - This is okay because in such case it just means that such apps should be patched on Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
