Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622 --- Comment #38 from Tim Fenn <[email protected]> 2009-07-27 15:29:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #37) > (In reply to comment #36) > > (In reply to comment #33) > > > (In reply to comment #32) > > > > I just removed the %exclude statement and built using F11 (since I > > > > won't be > > > > packaging this for F10 anyway). > > > > > > .. but won't you be building for EPEL, if you need this for pymol? > > > > > > > Right... in that case, using rm -f in %install isn't enough - > > brp-python-bytecompile runs after %install, so it just recreates the > > .pyc/.pyo > > files. The other option is to rename the files so they don't have a .py > > extension, but I'm not sure if that will break other tools. Could I just > > use a > > different spec file for the F-10 and EPEL branches? > > Duh. > > Yes, you can use a different spec file, or even better: > > %if 0%{?fedora}<11 || 0%{?rhel} == 4 || 0%{?rhel} == 5 > %exclude %{_bindir}/*.pyc > %exclude %{_bindir}/*.pyo > %endif will do. I'll hold off on requesting CVS access until I hear something regarding maloc version numbering. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
