Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xpdf - A PDF file viewer for the X Window System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207761 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-25 14:31 EST ------- You have super power to do patches quicker than light... You didn't repatch the xpdf-LANG/README files, though... It isn't a blocker (though it should be better). Moving to the issue of licencing I found that the LANG specific packages are under licences that are not GPL compatible (distribution without modification). Since it is font information (data), it seems to me that it doesn't contradict fedora goals, however it is dubious from a legal point of view to distribute the font information together with GPL code. It isn't obvious since it is code and font information. If the GPL part and distributable parts have to be split, it won't be obvious to do it since a simple split (for example all the xpdf-LANG*.tar.gz in a single package) wouldn't be right: in the xpdf-LANG.tar.gz the encoding files are covered by the GPL, only the CMap/* files are covered by the GPL-incompatible licence... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
