Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530743 --- Comment #3 from Sven Lankes <[email protected]> 2009-10-27 19:10:37 EDT --- Marcus, thanks for looking at the package > SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from > upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. NEEDSWORK I have talked to upstream about this - the maintainer is strongly opposed to adding LICENSE-Files. His argument is that licensing and copyright are per file. As the license is clearly stated in *every* source-file this shouldn't be an issue for the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
