Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: nspluginwrapper - A compatibility layer for Mozilla/Firefox plugins Alias: nspluginwrapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236521 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-13 14:24 EST ------- (In reply to comment #60) > You may miss some 32-bit library (i got this message for missing cairo-devel.i386) The BuildRequires: should handle this. Unless you're doing something really evil like building x86_64.rpm packages which actually have i386 binaries in, in which case you fall foul of RPM's limitations. > > 5) Decide whether you want to use this packaging or the alternative that > > dwmw2 > > prefers. I don't want to decide that. > > Definitely this one. It consists from only one package for each architecture > what contains everything what's important (wrapper&viewer) and meets all > cailon's requests. But you don't want both wrapper and viewer for the same arch. That's the whole point, surely? You'll want x86_64 plugin, and i386 wrapper. > > 6) *PLEASE* allow ppc builds before the initial version of this goes into > > the > > repo. It really wont take much to make it buildable. > > okay, i'll check that. The tarball builds fine, certainly. It doesn't look like upstream support was removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
