Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-CSS - Object oriented access to Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302261 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-24 10:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Ville, this package is noarch and therefore doesn't link against anything > GPL'ed. > => There is no license violation. Linking does not matter in this case because the original Artistic license, which is the license for the source code in this package, is not accepted in Fedora (by itself), no matter what it is linked to or not. (In reply to comment #4) > I already asked same license name to spot in PM and he told me for CPAN > modules > its allowed to use "GPL+ or Artistic." That's incorrect. Or more specifically, it's a too broad statement - "GPL+ or Artistic" is what we can use when upstream says "Licensed under the same license as Perl itself", which is very common for CPAN stuff. But in this case, upstream specifically says "Perl Artistic License" (which is not the same thing as "same License as Perl" which would be the "GPL+ or Artistic" case) and doesn't mention GPL at all, we cannot go ahead and claim it's GPL or add GPL to it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
