Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477199 --- Comment #2 from Kevin Kofler <ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org> 2008-12-19 14:49:36 EDT --- rpmlint output: > PolicyKit-kde.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > /usr/lib/libpolkitkdeprivate.so This library calls itself "private", is it really? If nothing should link against it, we should not ship this symlink at all. But if it is getting linked against, it should be in a -devel package (even if that's the only file in -devel). The strange thing is: shouldn't there be some public API for the client library? Why is the only library in this package called "private"? > PolicyKit-kde.i386: E: library-without-ldconfig-postin > /usr/lib/libpolkitkdeprivate.so.4.1.0 Missing "%post -p /sbin/ldconfig". > PolicyKit-kde.i386: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun > /usr/lib/libpolkitkdeprivate.so.4.1.0 Missing "%postun -p /sbin/ldconfig". > PolicyKit-kde.i386: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.-0.20081219svn-1 > ['0.20081219svn-1.fc9', '0.20081219svn-1'] I already mentioned this one in IRC, you said you uploaded a fixed specfile, but it's still broken in both the specfile and the SRPM which are now up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
