On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 11:02, Raymond E. Feist <[email protected]> wrote: > Anyway, this is longer than I intended, so I must be in "work avoidance > mode," which I will now leave and get back to. >
semantically, you will be exiting "work avoidance mode", and then rejoining "work avoidance mode"... this post by someone, who is, arguably in "work avoidance mode" himself... so don't take it too serious :/ irp
