Sorry to be the guy to do this, but LOTR is actually 6 books that were paired 
to form the three novels that we're familiar with, and also grouped into one 
big book in read lether with box, which I'm happy to mention that I have as a 
First Edition...
 
Chris
 



From: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Possible answer
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 21:37:01 -0800
To: [email protected]





On Dec 21, 2011, at 8:38 PM, Jamila Rose wrote:



And that is exactly what JK was going for.. the anti hero.. I think that’s why 
so many kids love the books.. because lets face it.. Harry is average.. for a 
wizard at least. Another reason the books reach a wider audience, is it doesn’t 
require you to create a whole other world with your imagination.. because its 
built within our reality. A kid can quite easily sit in school and daydream 
that the Hogwarts express is on its way to Hogwarts or that that owl is 
delivery post. I think that’s why you find that the books from the Narnia 
series, that are the most popular are the ones where the pevensie children are 
focused on.
 
Personally I know both Ray and JK are classified as fantasy writers, but the 
worlds they work in are completely different so I can’t compare them. I will 
however say this.. I know Ray you are a big fan of Tolkien.. however I much 
prefer to read your books over and over again.. then to tackle LOR again.. love 
the Hobbit.. but I much prefer how you space out your facts and history over 
multiples and multiples of books.. and not jam pack everything into 3... Don’t 
get me wrong Tolkien was a master.. but I've never quite forgiven him for his 
criticisms of his good friend C S Lewis!
'

Actually, you're almost right.  Harry is a prodigy, and turns out to be THE 
wizard.  What he is at the start of the first book is the nerdy kid who's 
bullied.  Rowling grabs your sympathy by having him be the kid confined to 
living under the stairs and a bratty cousin who's almost a cliche of bratty 
cousins.  The genius of that bit was the uncle and aunt were motivated, 
ultimately, by a mix of concern for Harry's (and their own) welfare, rather 
than any dislike of him.  He was an unwelcome burden, and where Rowling made it 
work was that they didn't hate him; they just didn't love him.  So, he was a 
boy alone and in the first book he finds his world and the people in it who 
(figuratively and literally) become his family.  It's not just friends, but 
eventually it's mentors, father figures, the ultimate grandpa, and finally a 
wife.


So the linkage is that every kid feels like an outcast, at least some of the 
time.  Even the most social kids often are that way for fear of feeling like an 
outcast.  Or if they're the "in kids" most of them look at the outcasts and 
secretly feel sorry for them, even if they never show it.  It's a magnificent 
trope for reeling kids in, and reminding adults of what it used to be like.  
And it played all over the world, because being a kid, well, it kind of sucks 
most of the time.


Tolkien on the other hand is from another world. At least another time.  His 
teachers were all 19th Century Oxford Dons and the like, and he had the classic 
British upper class Public School and University Education.  He revered the 
classics, and took a great deal of his inspiration from Goth-Germanic lore and 
especially the Elder Eddas. He wrote what he did for two reasons, to approach 
myth as a linguist and predicate his cultures on language (which is why you've 
got galloping great batches of information on the various elven dialects).  He 
also wanted to create a "Myth for Britain" which was a bit of a brag, as they 
already had a perfectly good one in King Arthur.    Tolkien grew up in a 
literary culture that had no mass media, except for the city newspaper,and 
weekly/monthly magazines.  He probably saw some silent films as a boy in his 
early teens. There were no radio; the BBC was formed when he was 30.  He was 
pushing 60 when TV arrived.  So he learned his craft at a time when readers 
wanted lush detail and lots of background.  Read him the way you would read Sir 
Walter Scott.


Me, I'm a modern writer and know that my readers want dialogue, narrative, and 
description in that order, and if I don't get on with the bloody damn story in 
a couple of pages putting down the book and checking their Facebook pages or 
Twitter.


Best,R.E.F.



----
www.crydee.com


Never attribute to malice what can satisfactorily be explained away by 
stupidity.





                                          

Reply via email to