"If you want to know Ray's views on this, or that, asking a question is On-Topic as it relates to Ray."
And if you want to be argue semantics, another rule "Avoid using humor or sarcasm in your post". Now whimsy, it could be argued, isn't the same as humor, as humour (got sick of us spelling) is for humours sake. Where whimsy is less overt, a tad more thought proking and distracting, and anyway that's besides the point, I asked Ray's opinion so according to your precious OT list, this is on topic, bah I only chucked in some whimsy because my friend mat got the amalgamated ire of Mr. Feist, ( well deserving ire btw, Feisty me ole China Plate!) caio ------Original Message------ To: Richard Williamson To: [email protected] Subject: Re: OT: Here you go Ray, some whimsey Sent: 21 Feb 2012 19:04 Link me up baby! ------Original Message------ From: Richard Williamson To: [email protected] Subject: Re: OT: Here you go Ray, some whimsey Sent: 21 Feb 2012 19:03 There is an OT list. And, there are rules about posting OT. Whimsy is not one of the allowed off-topics. The rules are on www.crydee.com Regards, rip On Feb 21, 2012, at 13:43, Adam Kemp <[email protected]> wrote: > "It's often said we take offense most in what we see of ourselves in others" Arutha in Magician © Raymond E. Feist 1982, 1992 > > > Why do I have to have the touchscreen blackberry *sigh* > Sent from my BlackBerry® > > -----Original Message----- > From: Adam Kemp <[email protected]> > Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 18:40:18 > To: <[email protected]> > Subject: OT: Here you go Ray, some whimsey > > What you reckon Ray? > > If a polar bear could reason, would it surmise that its on the wrong bloody continent? > > If the crocodile had clarity of vision, would it attempt the genocide of the alligators? And if so, what would their reasoning be? > "It's often said we take offense most in what we are of ourselves in others" Arutha in Magician © Raymond E. Feist 1982, 1992 > Sent from my BlackBerry® > > Sent from my BlackBerry®
