You know what, no disagreement, I surrender on the grounds of these damn Mis 
spellings!!
"Oh woe is the world, that has no place for whimsy." - Adam Kemp, today
------Original Message------
To: Matthew Rosier
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: OT: Here you go Ray, some whimsey
Sent: 21 Feb 2012 19:38

"Oh woe is the world, that has no place whimsy." - Adam Kemp, today

------Original Message------
From: Matthew Rosier
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: OT: Here you go Ray, some whimsey
Sent: 21 Feb 2012 19:36

If there is disagreement on it, Ray or Dan (list owner) will give us a ruling 
usually....   Ray or Dan?   > From: [email protected] > To: 
[email protected]; [email protected] > Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 
19:25:42 +0000 > Subject: Re: OT: Here you go Ray, some whimsey > > "If you 
want to know Ray's views on this, or that, asking a question is On-Topic as it 
relates to Ray." > > And if you want to be argue semantics, another rule "Avoid 
using humor or sarcasm in your post". Now whimsy, it could be argued, isn't the 
same as humor, as humour (got sick of us spelling) is for humours sake. Where 
whimsy is less overt, a tad more thought proking and distracting, and anyway 
that's besides the point, I asked Ray's opinion so according to your precious 
OT list, this is on topic, bah I only chucked in some whimsy because my friend 
mat got the amalgamated ire of Mr. Feist, ( well deserving ire btw, Feisty me 
ole China Plate!) caio > ------Original Message------ > To: Richard Williamson 
> To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: OT: Here you go Ray, some 
whimsey > Sent: 21 Feb 2012 19:04 > > Link me up baby! > > ------Original 
Message------ > From: Richard Williamson > To: [email protected] > 
Subject: Re: OT: Here you go Ray, some whimsey > Sent: 21 Feb 2012 19:03 > > 
There is an OT list. And, there are rules about posting OT. Whimsy is not one 
of the allowed off-topics. The rules are on www.crydee.com Regards, rip On Feb 
21, 2012, at 13:43, Adam Kemp <[email protected]> wrote: > "It's often 
said we take offense most in what we see of ourselves in others" Arutha in 
Magician © Raymond E. Feist 1982, 1992 > > > Why do I have to have the 
touchscreen blackberry *sigh* > Sent from my BlackBerry® > > -----Original 
Message----- > From: Adam Kemp <[email protected]> > Date: Tue, 21 Feb 
2012 18:40:18 > To: <[email protected]> > Subject: OT: Here you go 
Ray, some whimsey > > What you reckon Ray? > > If a polar bear could reason, 
would it surmise that its on the wrong bloody continent? > > If the crocodile 
had clarity of vision, would it attempt the genocide of the alligators? And if 
so, what would their reasoning be? > "It's often said we take offense most in 
what we are of ourselves in others" Arutha in Magician © Raymond E. Feist 1982, 
1992 > Sent from my BlackBerry® > > > Sent from my BlackBerry® > > 
Sent from my BlackBerry®


Reply via email to