I have never understood this argument that MACs are better for multimedia and 
everyone I have asked have said "I don't know they are just better".  They use 
the same processors now (Intel) and the same graphics cards (nvidia or AMD) and 
the same software (Corel or Adobe) which have been used in Windows machines for 
years.  For the same price point a Windows machine will be much better equipped 
and yet this myth as I believe it to be of MACs being better for multimedia 
work keeps persisting.  Does anyone know of a solid case where a MAC is better?

"and the art departments got early Macs."
> 
> Best, R.E.F.
> ----
> www.crydee.com
> 
                                          

Reply via email to