You can REVEAL whatever you like, we just ask as a courtesy you hit return about 10 - 12 times so that people who DON'T want to see a spoiler can avoid it. It's not that difficult
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Jason Green <[email protected]> wrote: > Have to say I sort of agree with Parks. It's hard to have a discussion about > Ray's books if we can't reveal spoilers about any books. > > Magician has been out for about 30 years now. Maybe we need to have a list > rule for new joiners that maybe they shouldn't read the list until they've > ready at least the first series? > > Seriously, of you haven't read at least Magician, why are you reading the > Feist list instead of Ray's actual books? > > I'd be shocked of the vast majority of this list hadn't read everything but > he most recent book or two. > > Sometimes this list makes me want to go back to my English lit classes and > tell "spoilers!" every time the prof tries to discuss Shakespeare. > > > > On Apr 4, 2012, at 1:19 AM, Parks White <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi all >> >> My auto correct error typo "pro army" instead of "primary" and subsequent >> clarification to Johns pedantic question authorizes "Shells" to ramp up the >> discussion to "defend " the many veterans and active duty service personnel >> "fans" (as if real warriors need defending) moves the discussion into the >> political too. A clear breach of the rules as well....Which I have now >> read...( I'm a newbie here)... the rules prohibits humor, satire, sarcasm, >> politics, race and religion.........perhaps we should write a new rule to >> eliminate the banal, trivial, stupid, pedantic, irritating, entertaining and >> tasteless contributions too.. There really is not much interesting or >> literary in the contributions I have read over the last 6 weeks..drinking >> shots in Newark Rhode Island included... perhaps the publishing gaff and >> that fans in the USA have had to wait 6 or more weeks for a book launch >> over the rest of the world should be discussed. A sign of a declining >> Empire?.. Is the Kingdom (sic) under threat?.Could it be a good reason for >> deploying more US troops?..also maybe too political and in such a >> sycophantic forum ....another reason to curb your First amendment >> Rights!.... Oh I forgot, the military have severely curtailed freedom of >> speech rights for the troops anyway..... And keep politics out of Sports >> too!...yeah right! ...Clearly the fan list was set up and managed by grey >> (regardless of age) bureaucrats...where is your passion , energy and >> creativity...I see none....Pathetic " spoilers" and other protocols restrict >> real discussions about plot and character...I have seen no interesting >> questions or contributions recently that add much value beyond vague error >> ridden snippets...I can only assume there is none here.... I will go and >> wait for the annual publication... I Hope it is better proofread and I will >> stick to blogs and forums that have something to say in future...... >> >> cheers >> >> Parks3 >> >> >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >> On 4/04/2012, at 1:22 PM, "James Young" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Seconded. >>> >>> -James >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- From: <[email protected]> >>> To: "feistfans-l" <[email protected]> >>> Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2012 7:52 PM >>> Subject: Re: New book replacement thread response. >>> >>> >>>> >>>> This email is exactly why politics is not discussed here on the List. Here >>>> it is about Ray's work, past and present, his likes and dislikes, and >>>> whatever else he'd like to discuss. >>>> >>>> There are many Veterans here, and active duty service members, of many >>>> countries whom love Rays work, which is why we are here. If you want to >>>> talk about politics there are plenty of places you can go to speak your >>>> mind on such matters, which is your right. >>>> >>>> There is a section on Crydee.com that speaks to the List rules if you are >>>> interested. >>>> >>>> Shells >>>> >>>> >>>> Sent on the Sprint® Now Network from my BlackBerry® >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Parks White <[email protected]> >>>> Sender: [email protected] >>>> Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 12:35:54 >>>> To: feistfans-l<[email protected]> >>>> Reply-To: "feistfans-l" <[email protected]> >>>> Subject: Re: New book replacement thread response. >>>> >>>> Hi John >>>> >>>> It suddenly also occurred to me that you might be serious.....if so, I >>>> hope the following clarifies your query. >>>> >>>> 1. It was an auto correct error...I found it humorous after i had sent the >>>> email and wanted to correct the typo quickly ( lesson here somewhere) >>>> 2. It was mild political commentary on my part, an indulgence.....I >>>> deplore militarism, military dictatorships, military >>>> spending......definitely not Pro Army, air force, marines... Sorry for >>>> laboring the point..... >>>> 3. I never say "oops" in an email unless repeating someone else's "oops" >>>> ...my 7 year old says oops (rarely) >>>> >>>> Good to see you comment on the most salient points made in my email. >>>> >>>> Parks3 >>>> >>>> Sent from my iPad >>>> >>>> On 4/04/2012, at 7:47 AM, John Buttimer <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Why would you add that you aren't pro army? Why not just say oops meant >>>>> primary? >>>>> >>>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> > > -- If you want to take the island, then burn your boats. With absolute commitment come the insights that create real victory. -Tony Robbins
